In Time We Trust: Validating Time Sources in Zero-Trust Architectures
02.26.2026
Marcel Geor, Senior Product Manager
In an era when digital systems underpin nearly every facet of modern life, time has emerged as a critical utility, on par with electricity, communications, and water. In sectors such as energy, telecommunications, finance, transportation, defense, data centers, and IT, precise timing underpins safety, coordination, data integrity, and operational continuity. As threats evolve and systems become more interconnected, safeguarding time sources is no longer optional; it is a strategic imperative.
Principles of Zero Trust
Zero trust is a cybersecurity philosophy that assumes no system, device, or signal is inherently trustworthy. Every component must be continuously verified, regardless of its origin or previous validation. When applied to time synchronization, this philosophy means rigorously authenticating all time sources, detecting anomalies, and implementing fallback mechanisms to maintain continuity. However, time validation is not an isolated function; it plays a foundational role across the broader zero-trust architecture. Accurate time is essential for enforcing time-based access controls, session expiration, and multifactor authentication within identity and access management systems. It ensures the integrity of time-stamped logs and telemetry, which are critical for detecting lateral movement, correlating events, and enforcing network segmentation. In distributed systems, synchronized time supports data consistency, secure backups, and blockchain operations. During incident response, reliable time sources enable precise forensic analysis and coordinated action across systems. In this context, time becomes more than a utility—it is a pillar of trust, underpinning authentication, authorization, and accountability in zero-trust environments.The Timing Core: Root of Trust
Each hardware node in a geographically distributed system is equipped with a timing core—a secure, tamper-resistant module. It acts as a local root of trust, receiving time from diverse sources, such as global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) (e.g., GPS, Galileo, GLONASS, and BeiDou Navigation Satellite System), terrestrial radio frequency (RF) signals, and internal oscillators like atomic clocks and oven-controlled crystal oscillators (OCXOs). These high-quality oscillators not only provide internal holdover during signal loss but also serve as trusted baselines for validating external inputs. The timing core continuously cross-verifies these inputs, detects anomalies, and isolates compromised signals, ensuring accurate cryptographic operations, secure logging, and synchronized behavior across distributed systems. Centralized oversight systems further enhance resilience by aggregating telemetry, auditing time consistency, and enforcing policy compliance.GNSSs and Industry Adoption
GNSSs have long been the backbone of global time synchronization due to their global reach and free availability. Industries such as telecommunications, finance, and energy rely on GNSSs for everything from mobile network coordination to time-stamping trades. This ubiquity, however, has created a single point of dependency that adversaries can exploit.Despite their effectiveness, GNSS signals are inherently vulnerable. GNSS signals received on earth are extremely weak, around −130 dBm, which is well below the thermal noise floor (about −114 dBm for a 1 MHz bandwidth). You can think of a GNSS like trying to hear a whisper from a friend on the other side of the room at a concert. With the right tools, you can still make out the message. These tools include spread-spectrum techniques and signal correlation to extract the signal from the noise.However, the technology is vulnerable to interference and jamming, whether accidental from adjacent or nearby RF transmitters, or intentional, where bad actors use jammers or spoofers to block or fake signals, potentially disrupting navigation and timing systems. Most civilian GNSS signals lack cryptographic authentication, making them susceptible to spoofing, where counterfeit signals mislead receivers, and meaconing, where the signal is rebroadcast with delays. These attacks can disrupt autonomous systems, communications, and critical infrastructure without breaching core networks. While initiatives like the Galileo Open Service Navigation Message Authentication (OSNMA) aim to introduce authentication, adoption remains limited, leaving many systems exposed.Augmenting GNSS With Other Signals of Opportunity
To reduce dependency on GNSS, organizations are turning to alternative and complementary time sources. The Precision Time Protocol (PTP), defined in IEEE 1588-2019, enables high-precision time synchronization over networks and includes optional security features, such as message integrity, origin authentication, and replay protection. However, inconsistent implementation across industries means PTP must be secured through layered defenses, including network segmentation, monitoring, and cryptographic validation.Low earth orbit (LEO) satellite constellations offer another promising alternative. Their proximity to earth results in stronger, more dynamic signals that are harder to spoof. Their rapid movement and diverse orbits enhance geographic resilience. However, LEO systems are still emerging, and challenges such as limited coverage, cost, and integration complexity must be addressed.Enhanced long-range navigation (eLORAN), a low-frequency terrestrial radio navigation system, provides a robust backup to a GNSS. Its low-frequency signals are difficult to jam or spoof and can penetrate environments where GNSS signals fail. Despite its resilience, eLORAN faces hurdles in terms of infrastructure investment, coverage, and regulatory support, which currently limit its deployment.Authentication and Security
Authentication is central to securing time synchronization. Without it, systems are vulnerable to spoofing and manipulation. Protocols like the authenticated Network Time Protocol (NTP) and secure PTP offer mechanisms to verify the origin and integrity of time data. Additionally, hardware-based security modules and cryptographic techniques can ensure that only trusted signals are accepted. Continuous monitoring and anomaly detection further enhance resilience, enabling systems to respond swiftly to irregularities.Summary
Time synchronization has moved from the background to become a frontline defense. As digital infrastructure becomes more complex and interdependent, the risks associated with compromised time sources are growing exponentially. By adopting zero-trust principles, diversifying time inputs, and investing in robust internal validation, organizations can mitigate these risks and ensure operational continuity.In time we trust, but only when it is verified, secured, and resilient. As threats evolve and dependencies deepen, protecting time becomes a strategic necessity. Organizations that treat time as mission-critical will be best positioned to navigate the complexities of the digital future.Contribute to the conversation
We want to hear from you. Send us your questions, thoughts on ICS and OT cybersecurity, and ideas for what we should discuss next.